Skip to content

Constructlaw

Construction Law Review is an update and discussion of current trends in construction law

MENU

HomeAboutContact

Search…

Home » Pennsylvania Federal District Court Holds That Obligee On Performance Bond May Not Maintain Bad Faith Claim Against Surety

Pennsylvania Federal District Court Holds That Obligee On Performance Bond May Not Maintain Bad Faith Claim Against Surety

By Constructlaw on June 5, 2002

Posted in Payment bond, Subcontract

The Norwood Company v. RLI Insurance Company
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5560 (E.D. Pa. 2002)

Tags: payment bond, Subcontract, The Norwood Company v. RLI Insurance Company

Email Tweet Like LinkedIn

Related Posts

California Appeals Court Provides Guidance on ‘Pay-When-Paid’ Provisions in Construction Subcontracts
Eleventh Circuit Holds That the Statute of Limitations on Payment Bond Claim Under Georgia Law Commences at Substantial Completion Rather Than Final Acceptance
Federal Court in Mississippi Holds That Although Projects Were Constructed With Federal Funds, They Were Not “A Public Work of the Federal Government” and Therefore the Court Had No Jurisdiction Over a Subcontractor’s Claim Under the Miller Act, Where the United States Was Not a Contracting Party and the Projects Were Not Constructed on Federal Property
Federal District Court in California Holds that Subcontract Provision Binding Subcontractor to Result of Dispute Resolution under Prime Contract Was Not an Effective Waiver of Miller Act Rights
U.S. District Court in Pennsylvania Holds Subcontractor’s Miller Act Suit Not Subject to Stay Pending Prime Contractor’s Prosecution of Claim Against Government

Search…

Authors Show/Hide

Stay Connected

RSS LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

Subscribe to this blog

Your website url

Topics

Topics

Archives

Archives

Recent Updates

Subtle (and Not So Subtle) Effects of COVID-19 on the Construction Industry
GAR Know How Construction Arbitration
Zooming Ahead: Challenges and Considerations for Virtual International Arbitration Proceedings in the Wake of COVID-19 Pandemic
Change in Georgia Lien Law
What the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Means for International Construction Disputes

Constructlaw

Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

RSS LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

About our Firm

Troutman Pepper is a national law firm known for its higher commitment to client care. With more than 1,100 attorneys in 23 U.S. cities, the firm partners with clients across every industry sector to help them achieve their business goals. Read more about the firm’s litigation, transactional, and regulatory practices at troutman.com.

Copyright © 2020, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Powered By LexBlog